Sunday, March 31, 2013

Op Ed: Words and Liberals

Liberals pride themselves as having the superior definition of a word. And inappropriately so conservatives have allowed them to be leader of the language and force their definitions on the culture. Their position of dominance regarding prose of the 21st century language is not because they are right, but because they have not been met with a clarifying voice of opposition.

Sadly those who do not know better, due to age and ignorance, are unaware of the verbiage-transformation. Some of the basic words of freedom and goodness of our American heritage have been usurped so to instead fit the destructive progressive agenda. And silent, apathetic, hesitant conservatives are allowing them to play this dangerous game. And, yes, our society is suffering this gradual adjustment.

The words, justice, freedom, equality, tolerance and pride are a few words used for the liberal cause. Re-defining has extended to images as well: for example, as a culture we have allowed certain communities to alter the branding of the rainbow. This creation “thing” is one of the most glorious demonstrations in nature, a specific message from God to remind us of His faithfulness. Yet due to conservatives’ silence, certain communities have skirted opposition in adopting it as their emblem. Their victory is not because there are many of them but because the message is repeated loudly and repetitively both visually and verbally. With no other present and visible alternatives to the meaning, the naive popular culture has gladly embraced this re-branding.

Words are a vital thing of our society. They hold power, persuasion, understanding and literal “feet” to a sentiment or philosophy. Creators of words establish the original intent and definition. When the actual definition of a word is faded, erased or eroded it is not because the definition no longer matters but because it is no longer used.

Conservatives, take heed. The American language is being black-mailed. The war for words is not over but, we need to quit acting like it is. Go back to the original Webster’s Dictionary, the original Greek and Hebrew roots, writings from words craftsmen from the Roman era and you tell me what the intent of those words are. We do not have to try and convince the world of the right meaning of the word, we just need to use it correctly, respectfully, boldly and in a way that honors its true meaning.

My point? Conservatives speak up. If you don’t clear your throat and clarify things, many of the ideas, philosophies and promises attached with the original intent will slip away for forever. Do not let the usurpers and their impostering agenda win.

Future generations will thank you.

- ajh

“To see evil and call it good, mocks God. Worse, it makes goodness meaningless. A word without meaning is an abomination, for when the word passes beyond understanding the very thing the word stands for passes out of the world and cannot be recalled.” 
Stephen R. Lawhead, Author

“The beginning of wisdom is the definition of terms.” 

Saturday, March 30, 2013

Skip the Credit Card: Use a Finger Tip

And you think I am joking? I am not.

Before you know it you will be able to cut down on the cards in the wallet; all you need is your finger. Could life be any simpler? Or - more complicated?

From their website: http://www.paytango.com/

Everywhere you are.

PayTango links the cards in your wallet to your fingerprints. Whether you're paying for your morning coffee, checking-in at the gym, checking-out at the grocery store, or adding a drink to your bar tab, you can count on us.

Friday, March 29, 2013

Youth Forum - at the UN?

Yes, Conservatives even the UN has a Youth Council.

No, we do not need or want more pizza parties, free t-shirts if we make phone calls for you, or Internship credits. We want to be taken seriously. We want you to listen.

If Big Brother Government is listening to us, won't you, too?

One of my favorite websites: Mashable has the story to which I refer.

5 Inspiring Speakers From the United Nations Youth Forum: Youth representatives and young leaders in social media gathered at the U.N. Headquarters in New York to discuss what the future holds for young innovators.

Description of America – of Yesterday & for Tomorrow


We have to get more people engaged in local government. Russell Kirk, one of the Foundational Thinkers who helped Americans understand the roots of conservatism (and who lived in Michigan!), has described America in a succinct way for me. I have included three paragraphs below. Don’t be dissuaded from reading by their size. 

He has presented the basics that should be common sense to every American. But even to me, a passionate and engaged citizen, has received great revelation and clarification in his prose. I have taken the liberty to embolden certain words that hit home for me…

These powerful passages are from his book, The American Cause:
“…the United States is not a centralized democracy. It does not have government from the top downward; on the contrary, it has government from the bottom upward. Strictly speaking, our government is federal, a union of states for certain explicit purposes of general benefit. Federation is very different from centralization. The theory of federation is this, that fifty sovereign states have conferred, of their own free will, certain powers upon the federal administration, to promote the interests of the several states and of the people within those several states. The United States are united voluntarily, and are united only for the purposes, and under the conditions, described in the federal Constitution. In the matters which most immediately affect private life, power remains in the possession of the several states; while within those fifty states, the people reserve to themselves control over most walks of life. The state governments, like the federal government, have been hedged and checked by constitutions and public custom.

“…Everywhere in America, individuals and private voluntary associations jealously reserve to themselves the rights of choice and action in those spheres of activity which most nearly affect the private person. The state touches these private concerns only upon sufferance, or not at all. Religious belief and affiliation are matters wholly of private choice; economic activity, by and large, is left to the will of individuals; social relationships are voluntary and private relationships; where one lives, and how, is not determined by political authority. Quite as much as in England, an American’s home is his castle. A great many Americans live their lives through without ever conversing with a civil servant, or even saying more than good morning to a policeman. Americans have no official identity card, or internal passports, or system of national registration. Until 1941, America never experienced peacetime conscription into the armed forces. Nowhere in the world is the operation of government less conspicuous than in the United States. If an American citizen desires to abstain altogether from political activity, even to the extent of never voting, no one interferes with him; and for millions of Americans, their only direct contact with government is their annual submission of income-tax reports. Private life looms much larger than public life in the American commonwealth.

Even in those concerns which have been opened to local or state or federal political activity, the theory persists that political authority operates only as a convenience to private citizens. The public schools, for instance, are intended simply to facilitate the education of young people, not to enforce the educational doctrines of central authority; although the states require that children should be schooled in some fashion, parents with the means are free to educate their children privately, or in denominational schools, if they prefer such methods to enrollment in public schools. The American assumption is that education is primarily the concern of the family and the individual, not of the political state; and this frame of mind extends to many more activities in which the state acts as servant, rather than as master.

“…So in America the things in which people are most interested generally remain strictly within the jurisdiction of private life. And in matters of public concern, it is the American habit to keep authority as close to home as possible. The lesser courts, the police, the maintenance of roads and sanitation, the raising of property-taxes, the control of public schools, and many other essential functions still are carried on, for the most part, by the agencies of local community: the township, the village, the city, the county. American political parties, in essence, are loose local associations: the state and national party organizations are the reflections of local opinion in caucus and town meeting. “
-          The American Cause by Russell Kirk, page 69-71.

Part of the reason this text is so poignant to me is that Russell Kirk tells me what America used to look like, what it should look like and what my generation should work towards making it again.

The older generations are alarmed at the absence of young adults’ participation in the cry to oppose the growing government. Russell Kirk’s book was initially published in 1957 (it has had updates since then). Since that first printing, much has happened to the culture where those born in the 70’s, 80’s and 90’s need to read a book like this not only to understand, many for the first time, what government’s role is supposed to look like but who and what America truly is – a haven for a free, independent and responsible people.

For your convenience, here is a direct link to Amazon. When you’re purchasing it – say a prayer that these powerful descriptions of the beauty of America become obvious again to the generation who is stepping up to lead it.

- ajh

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Op Ed: It's Time to Tell Us No


We have forgotten about the transition of aging; the ending of childhood; and the potential of the hard work of youth.

As a Millennial, my charge is this: It is okay to say no. With good intention of our elders, we have been enabled, babied and spoiled. We do not need more stuff, more freedom or more allowance as a young person. The younger generation needs to learn that money does not grow on trees, the government is not nor should it be the “parent” of freedom, and liberty does not come without a price.

The aspects that have made America great still reside in each one of us. The God given inalienable rights to improve ourselves, to provide for our posterity, to be prudent with our dollar, and to experience the hard work of our hands, are available to the next generation. But unless we have a need to experience it, we will give in to our base humanity that is lazy, irresponsible and self-indulging. In other words, if you provide it, we’ll calibrate our lives so that your provision is sufficient and our labor is not necessary.

You can tell your teenager to turn off the video games and get a job; no, your son and his girlfriend cannot live in your basement; no, you will not sign a car loan for an unemployed daughter; no, you will not get your child a smart phone; no, you do not still need to do your post college child’s laundry. It is time you forced us and allowed us to transition.

Set yourself free as a generous and benevolent adult. With loving observation let the younger people fend for themselves. The taste of desperation and failure pushes one on to a pursuit for prosperity and success. With you by their side, at a healthy distance, the young people will succeed. They cannot fail. This nation is great. It has given us the system, tools and freedoms to succeed. It’s time we started to experience it. 

- ajh

Published at: http://amyjhawkins.blogspot.com/ 

(Writer's Note: If you are interested in using this piece in your newspaper, blog, website etc, please feel free to do so. Would you email me and let me know how you have used it? I hope it helps. Thank you! amyjaynehawkins@gmail.com)

Additional Article "The Millennials" http://amyjhawkins.blogspot.com/2012/06/millennials-official-piece-by-amy.html

Conservative Leaders Pay Attention to Messaging

The liberals are doing a fantastic job on messaging. There, I did it. I complimented the liberals.

Let's say little Jane gets a new puppy. The puppy is all over the place with its abundance of energy! Distracted, rambunctious, playful would be a few of the applicable descriptives to a dog this age. Well, Mom is calling from the doorway and it is time for Jane and puppy to go inside. It's easy for her to walk herself inside, but how does she convince the free-willed puppy to comply?

1. Stand and look at the puppy, talk about the puppy, complain about the puppy and bemoan the puppy because he's not following Mom's directions or

2. Should she talk to the puppy in a tone of voice he will respond to, present a reward that solicits a dog's attention, using dog format (whatever that looks like) then convince that puppy to follow?

In other words, will she be more successful complaining about why the puppy doesn't follow; or should she try communicating with a puppy in language he might understand?

I'm thinking her projection of frustration toward the puppy will have zilch impact on the puppy and the ability to accomplish the task Mom has asked her to do. But I'm thinking Jane using means of communication for puppy language might help her convey her point and accomplish her goal.

Hello Conservatives!! Republican Party! Ideology purists! I'm talking to you.

In this analogy, the GOP leaders are Jane and her mom. The Millennials, of which I consider myself a member, are the puppy. To the established, and non established GOP, I pose this question: why get frustrated at someone for something they are not doing when they do not understand what you are asking them to do?

You want the Millennials to understand why the 2012 Election was so important, why 2014 victories are imperative, why public policy decisions are detrimental or why a moral decision can have implications. But the questions should address: Are you using the wrong language, in an old paradigm, promising rewards or consequences that do not matter to your audience and attempting to move them towards a goal they do not understand?

You can keep trying to reach us by making the GOP outreach more "diversified", attempting more "cool" meetups and networking opportunities, or promise to give us internships, jobs after college or create the newest "app" for our smart phones.

But deep down inside we are looking for you  to speak to what is in the core of our being. We are like any other constituent base in America: we care about people, causes and money. The longer you deflect your frustration on that which you want to activate, and continue to use ill-placed messages with unclear goals, you simply prove to the young adults that the left, liberals, Democrats, progressives really do have the upper hand.

Hurry Republican party and conservatives of all breeds! Think outside the box. You have the right principles. Just hurry and frame things in a way Millennials can understand!

Jane can hear the thunder in the distance; if she does not get creative quick, she and puppy will get stuck in the storm. And the responsibility of how they will experience the storm does not rest on the unknowing puppy. The full weight of reaction and action rests on Jane. The puppy's safety is dependent on Jane. And we as Millennials are dependent on you.